Rant: Just for kids?
you'll see a story about an adult, but then it's usually about an adult teaching children. Do a search on history and you'll see some actual history. Search on physics and you'll get stories about kids mixed in with stories about people doing actual physics. So why are there so few stories about adults doing mathematics?
It's not just in news stories. Look at Texas Instruments' and Hewlett Packard's web sites and you'll see that calculators are largely marketed towards kids. TI are much worse on this front. They have powerful calculators that can solve all kinds of real world problems and yet they're not being marketed as devices for solving such problems, they're about getting kids through exams. HP at least have a section for professionals. Even so, in the old days if an HP calculator had exchangeable faceplates it was so that you could label the keys with new functions, but now it's to change the colour to make it look cool. The only people working with numbers are clearly children.
On closer inspection I see that I was wrong. I missed a story. It's about an adult. No mention of children or education. Ah...it's about an adult who can't do mathematics.
So clearly no adults use mathematics. So why do we bother teaching children a skill they'll never use in adulthood?
Labels: mathematics
posted by sigfpe at Wednesday, December 07, 2005
1 Comments:
I'm amazed how many people get into computer graphics via computer science rather than, say, mathematics. It's considered to be a branch of computer science in fact. This makes no sense to me at all. The toughest part of 3D rendering is mostly either geometry, physics or numerical methods. People who study computer science aren't really grounded in these subjects. The computer science parts of 3D graphics (eg. programming languages, efficient datastructures, parsing scene descriptions and so on) are easy to learn by comparison.
Post a Comment
<< Home